- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 21:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Roger Kittelson
- Roger Kittelson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mr. Kittlelson does not meet the specific notability requirements under WP:POLITICIAN. Whether the article meets the general biographical requirements are debatable. Dolotta ( talk) 16:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This article has been around awhile but has not been grown by knowledgeable Wikipedians, apparently due to how minor a political figure Mr. Kittleson is. This article is, in my opinion, dead wood as a result. TH1980 ( talk) 22:38, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails our Notability guideline for politicians. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - we almost never keep such stubs. Bearian ( talk) 17:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per NPOL. Unsuccessful candidate, no other indicia of notability. Montanabw (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.