The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{( spin me / revolutions)} 21:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Rodney Glassman (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted in 2009. Fails WP:NPOL as a city council member and failed candidate and WP:GNG and if not deleted, needs to be rewritten to be less promotional. SportingFlyer talk 09:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete The fact that he is a failed candidate who hasn't held a significant public office is enough for deletion, in addition to the reasons listed in the nomination. Redditaddict69 ^{(click here if I screwed up stuff again) (edits)} 09:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 11:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 11:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 11:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 11:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 11:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete Respectable career of public service, but no singular achievements, no extraordinary coverage by media, and has not been elected to major office. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 22:37, 15 August 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete not even close to being notable. Not all candidates are notable. Nor are members of the Tucson city council default notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.