The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 18:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Robert Tingle (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed candidate for public office with little coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL.

WP:BEFORE done: nothing found. –– Redditaddict69 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. –– Redditaddict69 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. –– Redditaddict69 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Libertarianism-related deletion discussions. – MJL  ‐Talk‐ ^☖ 19:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete - fails NPOL and certainly doesn't satisfy consensus on other aspects. With 2 senate elections, there isn't a "biggest election" to redirect to. As a side note, the 2008 section actually reads as if it was written by the other side. Nosebagbear ( talk) 22:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete a non-notable defeated politician. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete not WP:GNG. Lubbad85 ( talk) 15:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.