The result was no consensus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Not a single in-depth reference from a reliable, independent source. Searches turned up the reason why. There aren't any. Onel5969 TT me 13:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Hey guys! I'm pretty new to Wikipedia and a little bit confused about why this page is up for deletion? I am not arguing either way, but I hope to learn from my mistakes going forward. I created two articles at the same time about similar people and using roughly the same amount of sources from the same places. One was approved immediately, but this one has been back and fourth from draft space to published space and is now being considered for deletion. There are independent references from news websites New Scientist, Forbes, ENWorld, Nerdbot, The Gamer, Geeknative, Tribality, and 80LV. There are also independent references from industry websites Board Game Geek and RPG Geek as well as appearances and interviews with Marriner-Dodds on podcasts Mammoth Gamescast, Game Store Prophets, and Morrus' Unofficial Tabletop RPG Talk. I can understand why the podcast interviews and appearances may not count as good sources and I can remove those without an issue, but I do not understand why the others are not considered? Again I want to stress that I am NOT arguing in either direction for this article, but I'd really appreciate the chance to learn what I did wrong, and if possible to move the article back into draft space for continued improvements? Cllrphil 10:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cllrphil ( talk • contribs)