The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep as has been Mayor of Hagerstown (which ranks as Maryland's sixth largest incorporated city) multiple times; also
commonly "Local politicians whose office would not ordinarily be considered notable may still clear the bar [for notability] if they have received national or international press coverage, beyond the scope of what would ordinarily be expected for their role." — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Btyner (
talk •
contribs)
02:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. The politician received brief coverage for
one event, and the event (a social media post) wouldn't even warrant its own Wikipedia article. At this time, this person is not notable enough to clear
WP:BASIC or
WP:NPOL.
Newslinger (
talk)
08:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Our notability criteria for mayors is not based on an arbitrary population cutoff — it's based on whether the sources enable us to write a substantive article (as opposed to just "he is a mayor who said something stupid once, the end".) Also, please read
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS: just because an article exists about somebody else doesn't mean it necessarily should — so the existence of any article is not prima facie evidence in favour of or against the includability of any other article.
Bearcat (
talk)
12:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. A single
WP:BLP1E article about a mayor saying a dumb thing is not, in and of itself, enough coverage to get him over
WP:NPOL #2. If the article were sourced well enough to be genuinely substantive, that would be a different story — but this, as written, is not enough to make him includable. Our inclusion test for mayors is based on the sourcing, not the city's population. If somebody wants to nominate Gavin Buckley in response to Btyner's misguided OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, then I'd happily vote to delete there as well, because he's not sourced well enough either.
Bearcat (
talk)
12:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete mayors do not automatically get a notability waiver even where they serve a city with a substantial population, and here there's only one source and that source has
WP:BLP1E concerns. Clear delete.
SportingFlyertalk21:11, 15 July 2018 (UTC)reply
I've removed (commented out) the section/reference with BLP1E concerns, added a different reference (the official website) and tagged it as a stub. Better?
Btyner (
talk)
03:15, 20 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete mayors do not get automatically notability in cities this size, and the article itself provides undue weight to a minor post written on facebook.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
01:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.