The result was keep. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Hello, I am writing to delet Rick Baxter, this is soley based on the deletion of current Escondio City Council Woman Diaz. Though Rick Baxter WAS an elected official, is catastrophic decline to used car dealer makes him someone who really doesn't make hi news worthy. Moreover, his page, which is fraught with inaccuracy and pontification to out-and-out lies, further deminish not only his credibility, but the reason he should be deleted from the site.
To continue, if the Escondido Council woman who has overcome so much diversity to be elected in a larger city, that is even the more reason for him to be deleted as he represented a very small portion of Michigan, with less people than that of the City of Escondido itself.
I rely on Wikipedia for the starter point for much of my research and this person is not even remotly significant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdjoebrown ( talk • contribs) 27 October 2010
On the notability front the challenge may fail. Notability isn't temporary. If something was ever notable, then it's notable forever. Wikipedia has, and ought to have, articles on all kinds of topics that are purely of historical interest. But I don't know how important a county leader is, over in the US, and it may be that this person fails WP:POLITICIAN. I don't need to parse that in any detail, because over and above the nominator's challenge, there's also a BLP issue.
On the BLP front the challenge undoubtedly succeeds. We simply can't have articles on living people with so few sources, and I've not been able to find any others. With apologies to Mandsford, with whom I often agree, I have to disagree in this case and say delete.—
S Marshall
T/
C
18:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
reply
(Later) Apparently JimMillerJr is better at searching for sources than I am! I'm now much happier with the sources and I've struck my "delete" accordingly.— S Marshall T/ C 18:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC) reply