The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Kurykh (
talk) 01:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:NPOL as defeated political candidate. No other claim to notability.
AusLondonder (
talk) 04:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:SNOW and
WP:POLOUTCOMES. We almost always delete unsuccessful candidates, especially when they garner less than 12 % in a riding election.
Bearian (
talk) 17:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Unelected candidates do not get articles just for being candidates, and this makes no credible claim that he has preexisting notability for anything else.
Bearcat (
talk) 21:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete per above comments (and nom). Not notable coming in third in an election with no other claim to notability. --
TheSandDoctor (
talk) 20:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.