From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 02:29, 24 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Richard Spindler (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a politician notable only as a representative on a local school board. This is not a claim of notability that passes WP:NPOL — the lowest level of office that entitles a person to an article is the state legislature — and the referencing here is extremely reliant on primary and user-generated sources, so WP:GNG isn't passed either. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 10:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Non-notable politician that also fails to meet the GNG. 131.118.229.17 ( talk) 00:22, 12 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti *Let's talk!* 04:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. No secondary coverage outside of local, run-of-the-mill stuff. Doesn't pass any prong of the notability guideline for people, either for being associated with a school board or for his academic career. Funny, there are actually Richard Spindlers with more coverage (no, they wouldn't meet the general notability guideline either). czar  04:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.