The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Resumé looking article for a non notable politician, businessman & engineer falling short of
WP:NPOL &
WP:BASIC and also does not seem to have any in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence does not scale
WP:GNG either.
Celestina007 (
talk)
11:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in future elections they have not yet won — the notability test at
WP:NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one. But this makes no claim that he has preexisting notability for any reason that would have gotten him into Wikipedia independently of the candidacy, and cites not even remotely close to enough campaign coverage to make his candidacy more nationally special than everybody else's candidacies. Obviously no prejudice against recreation after election day if he wins the seat, but nothing here is a reason why he would already qualify to have a Wikipedia article today. Once again, with feeling: Wikipedia is not a free public relations database for aspiring politicians to advertise or promote their campaigns.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:58, 16 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. The subject appears to be a well-established businessman but the sources do not rise to the level of notability for a Wikipedia article and therefore fails
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO. Also, as a political candidate, this does not meet
WP:NPOL. -
AuthorAuthor (
talk)
18:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.