- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Joe ( talk) 16:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Richard F. Trump ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable mayor who fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Article is written in an almost promotional format. SportingFlyer talk 16:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NPOL isn't met, and the existing referencing isn't sufficient. It's almost a WP:BLP1E (that event being his bizarre resignation), a later court settlement regarding a debt shouldn't be mentioned at all. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:34, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Hagerstown is not large enough to hand its mayors an automatic presumption of notability just because they exist, but there's nowhere near enough sourcing here to get him actually satisfy NPOL #2. Bearcat ( talk) 18:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable politician who also fails to meet WP:GNG. The only event of any consequence was his resignation and that would fall under WP:BLP1E. Papaursa ( talk) 02:45, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete He is indeed a non-notable politician. TH1980 ( talk) 04:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete the article reads like a campaign broucher. It in no way demonstrates that Trump was a notable mayor. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.