- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Richard Butler (British politician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. WP:BLP, with campaign brochure overtones and poorly sourced, of a local politician. As always, Wikipedia does not grant an automatic notability freebie to the mayors of English civil parishes, where the mayoralty is a purely ceremonial position that rotates annually so that everybody on council gets a turn -- in England, mayoralty only equals an automatic presumption of notability in cities where the position is directly elected, and otherwise it's pass WP:GNG or bust. But for sourcing, what we have here is his profile on the council's own website, a single article about his swearing-in as ceremonial mayor, and a "why you should vote for me" essay written by him in the local newspaper when he ran for election to Parliament -- but he lost that election, and non-winning candidates for Parliament don't get automatic inclusion freebies either. And both the council website and the self-penned campaign essay are primary sources that cannot assist a notability case, leaving us with just the swearing-in article for reliable sourcing — but one reliable source does not constitute a GNG pass. Nothing here is substantive enough ("campaigning on issues around parakeets"?), or sourced well enough, to make him more notable than the norm for a ceremonial non-executive mayor or an unelected parliamentary candidate. Bearcat ( talk) 23:39, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Non-notable local politician. Bearcat has it absolutely right about non-directly-elected mayors, unless they've made their own mark in some other way. (That's my English POV.) See Buggins' turn. Narky Blert ( talk) 00:25, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable in line with WP:BIO - "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability"
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 01:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN and no evidence of a WP:GNG pass. Thanks, JohnTombs48 ( talk) 12:48, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete At the risk of repetition, fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Paste Let’s have a chat. 16:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.