The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 21:32, 1 March 2011 (UTC)reply
This article is about a judge with no coverage in
reliable sources to establish notability.
Whpq (
talk) 14:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Being a judge on a state trial court does not, by itself, establish encyclopedic notability.
bd2412T 20:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete Actually,
WP:JUDGE states that judges on the top level in common law, which a state supreme court is (see
WP:COURTS are inherently notable as long as they are permanent sitting members. However, according to the supreme court
official website he is not actually on the Supreme Court (and must be on a lower court or on an ad hoc committee) he is not notable.
Ravendrop 21:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment I read supreme, when I should have read Superior.
Ravendrop 21:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.