- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Twenty One Pilots discography. Keeping in mind the intensive edit warring, there is unanimous consensus that indefinite protection or full protection be applied. ( non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 04:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Regional at Best ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
If you need to view the content, look at a version that contained text. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. This is an early recording by a notable group, but by itself is not notable. I have looked for sources to satisfy GNG or NALBUM and none exist. The ones that the fans bring up are mentions of content in the album or discussions of members at the time of the recording, but nothing concrete. Taking to Afd as requested here Walter Görlitz ( talk) 15:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- An admin will have to include the AfD notice on the page as it's locked. The tool I use added it
here
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
15:33, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- I did that. Note that this is the version editors should look at when deciding on notability. -- NeilN talk to me 15:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It doesn't meet
WP:NALBUM or
WP:GNG. I would vote for it to be restored as a redirect but made so no one can easily change it.
Boleyn (
talk)
16:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed. It is a redirect now and it's locked until 8 June 2017 so it's not likely to be restored to the article anytime soon, but @
Boleyn: I hear you say, keep as redirect and
salt or
permanently protect.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
17:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with that idea. It is an legitimate album from a legitimate band, a redirect is fine. But it is not now, nor will it ever be notable, there is no need for an article. So, if we keep the redirect, we would need to prevent it from becoming an article in the future. Like a permanent administrative lock. Kellymoat ( talk) 17:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed. It is a redirect now and it's locked until 8 June 2017 so it's not likely to be restored to the article anytime soon, but @
Boleyn: I hear you say, keep as redirect and
salt or
permanently protect.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
17:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Due to the amount of edit warring on this, a permanent lock seems the best solution. Boleyn ( talk) 19:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:30, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:30, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.