- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Reactions to the 2023 Turkish presidential election ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:N; unnecessary based on precedence. We've never created entire pages of reactions for elections as far as I can tell, even for larger nations such as the USA, France, or Brazil, or similarly regional powers such as Argentina. The only remotely similar article I can find deals with that of Belarus in 2020, which was deemed notable due to the divided claims of victory and massive protests following. With most of this article being simple congratulations, it can be far more appropriately addressed on the election page. The Kip ( talk) 05:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Entirely unnecessary article.
-
Alexcs114 (
talk)
08:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unnecessary, no demonstration that the reaction are notable enough for their own article. — Czello ( music) 08:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Turkey. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - 2023 Turkish presidential election#Reactions covers the topic sufficiently enough. A separate page is unnecessary and contains too much commonplace material.
- Godtres ( talk) 11:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Seems to have been draftified already? -- GGT ( talk) 14:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- GGT, it was draftified by the creator and subsequently submitted again through AfC with just a minor change to a few sources. Since users here right now aren't in favour of draftification but rather deletion on the basis that this is outright not notable on its own, I've reverted the move to allow for this discussion to continue, as this may be an attempt to evade the AfD. ~Styyx Talk? 14:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete – utterly pointless article, made all the more pointless by not actually stating what most of the reactors actually said or how they reacted. Salient points, if there are any, can be included in the main article on the election. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 14:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per all the points above. Aintabli ( talk) 19:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete If a reaction is meaningful, it should be described in context. This is not the place to catalogue without context entirely routine statements made after pretty much every election. Reywas92 Talk 20:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete this seems to not be anything of value, does not detail what reactions actually were. Masohpotato ( talk) 17:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete nothing worth merging, and this article is just a pointless list of countries that posted about the election. Would just be a WP:QUOTEFARM if the quotes were in the article, but it's even less useful than that. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.