The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 15:16, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Student a capella group with constantly fluctating membership. It has released several self produced albums but doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSIC to me. -- Martyman- (talk) 08:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Multiple other student a cappella groups have had wikipedia entries for lengthy amounts of time without this issue. (ie. University of Pennsylvania's Penn Masala, Tufts' Beelzebubs, Brown's Brown Derbies, Cornell's Hangovers etc) Look at the "list of collegiate a cappella groups" site and see there are many links to individual pages. There doesn't seem to be an issue with these groups, yet this criticism would apply equally to all of them as well. Let's be consistent. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.135.194.144 ( talk • contribs) .
What are they being marked for? I don't see what violation they are making that other college a cappella group entries are not. They create music, which qualifies them as a music group. Noutbounde 18:58, 11 March 2006 (UTC) reply
In addition, the group has won national recognition. The ICCAs is one of the two biggest a cappella contests in the country (the other being BOCA). Winning recognition in this contest is a significant accomplishment, especially for so young a group. The group is also notable in that it has performed in many states, and with many of the nation's best a cappella groups. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Annelisep ( talk • contribs) .
Keep. Low-grade notable, like many such groups at major universities. Monicasdude 00:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC) reply