The result was keep. Many of the delete arguments here do not relate to wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and so have little weight, while the nominator his withdrawn support for deletion. The keep arguments demonstrate that the article meets the WP:POLITICIAN notability guideline and the copyright concerns appear to have been dealt with. Therefore there is a consensus here for keeping the article based on wikipedia's guidelines. Davewild ( talk) 18:35, 5 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Messed up and obviously cannot be fixed. J (t) 06:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Respected administrators and users, even i want it be kept but my request is just to start a new talk page for the article, otherwise 'I' specially will quit to the article Although, as per JamesBWatson ( talk) the article has Good article standards but when any of us nominated it for Good Article User Arthur Rubin just Canceled it at first. we people are not so fluent in using Wikipedia like you people. The request here is just only to clear the talk page once or Article itself once deleted. I will create it with in ten minutes as i am having the source file complete. please consider the GA nomination, Talk page factor or we will loose our trust a lot. Thank You Very Much -- Alcides86 ( talk) 13:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
I still saying please consider our request of talk page or tell us the way to move merge so that it has a fresh talk page, for gods sake its our right here we contributed a lot thanks -- Ballisticizer ( talk) 13:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn deletion nomination - I think the article is fine now. :) --
J
(t)
15:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
reply
Respected, Phil Bridger ( talk) however i have already requested to above present administrators here to solve the issue of talk page, that is to restore it to the beginning for one time for Christ's sake, as this article was understood as a homage to him, but its talk page turned into some thing day by day made us to abandon ourselves from Wikipedia since we were never as fluent as you people, please consider my request for one time on moral grounds. Please consider my helpless requests, i apologize on my side, Thanks a lot -- Alcides86 ( talk) 07:06, 1 July 2012 (UTC) reply