From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Raju Rijal

Raju Rijal (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article's subject fails WP:NCRIC and therefore the WP:GNG. Longstanding consensus at WP:CRIC that under-19 international cricketers are not inherently notable. GreenCricket TALK 10:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 17:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 11:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 11:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.