The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test for politicians is holding a notable political office, not just running for one. But this literally doesn't even try to demonstrate that he had any preexisting notability for any other reason besides the candidacy, and the only reference is his own political party's
self-published website about itself rather than a notability-conferring reliable or independent source, which means he's passed neither of the other two paths to making an unelected candidate more notable than other unelected candidates. And furthermore, I suspect some form of
conflict of interest editing here, since the page creator has "Kumawat" in their username and their edit history has been devoted entirely to people whose surname was also Kumawat — I don't know whether these people are all one family or not, but there's certainly a singular focus on the name.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.