The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton |  ^Talk 22:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Rajee Narinesingh

Rajee Narinesingh (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable individual; recreation of previously deleted article —Мандичка ^YO 😜 01:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC) reply

• Speedy-Was previously deleted as a afd. Wgolf ( talk) 20:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Evaluating the article as it currently exists, there are citations to multiple sources which establish notability. The AfD discussion for the previous article of the same name brought up WP:BLP1E, which itself states that "WP:BLP1E should be applied only to biographies of living people and to biographies of low-profile individuals." An actress doesn't seem like a "low-profile individual" as intended by that guideline. — GrammarFascist _contribs ^talk 10:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete as I see nothing better and the sources are from the usual websites covering these controversial subjects. Pinging David Fuchs and L235. SwisterTwister talk 02:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep Passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 02:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep Decently sourced article about an actress. Dimadick ( talk) 07:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete the article is essentially identical to the one last created by the same person. Using "actress" to cover this individual, when they appear to only have two IMDB credits to their name not attached to the 1E event (with one item being unreleased, the other apparently never receiving any mass release except via IMDB itself), seems like a stretch. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^{( talk)} 18:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete as per nom, SwisterTwister, David Fuchs and Wgolf. The press all comes from a single incident, clear case of WP:BLP1E. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete per David Fuchs Hillbillyholiday ^talk 04:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete. For once, a WP:BLP1E argument that I agree with. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 23:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep. The consensus above is to delete based on WP:BLP1E, though on looking at sources, it appears to me that the subject contains to retain some interest in the media after the event. The subject seeks out the media, and is interviewed on aspects of the incident, and on other aspects of her life. There are a number of sources covering several years, which talk about her in depth. Daily Mail 201 and Daily Mail 2015. There is a book on her (apparently written by her) Beyond Face Value, and there may be others, but I'm having difficulties tracking down the pages on which she is mentioned - but a Google books search with her name turns up several hits. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 19:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC) reply
  • The Daily Mail articles are tabloids and do not count as independent reporting - they are just discussing her appearance on Botched and a local TV station. A book she wrote herself wouldn't give her notability, she would have to be successful enough to meet WP:AUTHOR. —Мандичка ^YO 😜 05:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.