- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Rafael Him ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local politician, elected to a
county board for which there is no article yet; no indication of notability per
WP:POLITICIAN, and no significant coverage online from
WP:Reliable sources. Military record is commendable, but doesn't meet
WP:MILPEOPLE. Proposed deletion contested by another editor with a new account.
Norvoid (
talk) 16:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Norvoid ( talk) 16:55, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Norvoid ( talk) 16:55, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:NOTEBLP for lack of significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. There is a lack of in depth coverage. As the nominator noted, he also fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:MILPEOPLE. -- Bejnar ( talk) 03:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. County board members can get over WP:NPOL #3 if they're sourced well enough to satisfy WP:GNG, but it's not a level of office that confers an automatic presumption of notability just because the board member exists. But the sourcing here is far too dependent on primary and unreliable sources, with not nearly enough reliable source coverage shown to get over GNG, and nothing else here constitutes an automatic inclusion freebie either. Bearcat ( talk) 23:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.