- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- RaDene R. Hatfield ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Hatfield was a candidate for state senate who was defeated. This is not a high enough level of political involvement to be notable, and the sources do not rise above routine coverage. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 22:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 16:16, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 16:16, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN; reads like the candidate herself wrote it. Instaurare ( talk) 23:47, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-winning candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates; if you cannot make and reliably source a credible claim that she gets over another notability criterion for another reason, then she has to win the seat, not just run for it, to become notable because candidate in and of itself. And with the entire article being based on just one piece of WP:ROUTINE campaign coverage, WP:GNG has not been met either. Bearcat ( talk) 15:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.