The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Pyala Prasadarao (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful, unfortunately. Saqib ( talk) 12:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train ^Talk 12:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train ^Talk 12:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete. –no evidence of notability. Plain advertising. – Ammarpad ( talk) 14:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete. This is parked entirely on primary sources, with no evidence of reliable source coverage about the subject shown at all, and it states nothing that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt this person from having to be referenced to reliable source coverage. Bearcat ( talk) 18:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete as failing notability and serves as just a promotion. MT Train ^Talk 05:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.