The result was keep. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:14, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (books) -- lacks multiple reliable independent sources mentioning the topic in a non-trivial way. Only has one source currently, and that one's quite trivial (half a sentence worth of discussion in the whole article). There's no dispute that this book did exist, but it's not important enough to get anything but extremely passing mention in other references. It's a historical footnote at best to be mentioned in an article about history of sex studies or something, if that, not for a full article. DreamGuy ( talk) 18:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC) reply
{{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help) Kaan work is discussed as the first of a kind on pp 51-52, (in footnote 40 there is a ref to Kaan's work being subjected to analysis by Foucault (see below), on p 84 Kaan work is compared with Krafft-Ebing's{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help) (the Foucault text), see pp 233-234 which is not merely passing mention, Kaan's work is identified as "the first text". Kaan is mentioned at some 15 other occasions in that book{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help) only snippet views, but Kaan's work appears to be discussed over pages 435-437, and there is a verbatim quote on p 437.