The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 13:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a neologism that has gained little traction - most cited sources are referencing the same original use and it has little acceptance elsewhere. The description given it by the creating editor was simply a discussion of the history and prevalence of genealogy itself and not this supposed fixation. Alternative - redirect to
Genealogy.
Agricolae (
talk)
00:51, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
reply
This shows that Turkish, Armenian and Jewish people also succumb to progonoplexia. That is important information about the use of the word, and for the peoples of those nationalities. If the definition of the word has spread beyond Greece, we should not be favouring one nationality over another. The reason given for removal was simply "not what the source says" with no explanation about the editor's interpretation about what he thinks the source does say. Paul Bedson ❉ talk❉ 16:10, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply