The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable "micronation". No residents. "lends (sic) are a previous Nature park and no inhabitеd forest, there are no permanent residents, the Principality have no population on the ground and any other form of government type or elections are impossible." Even a micronation must have residents. See
Montevideo Convention. No recognition. Very limited media coverage. Fails
WP:GNG. Even by micronation standards, this doesn't qualify.
John Nagle (
talk)
22:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)reply
DeleteRedirect. I was involved in trimming down the article back in 2015 (the old cruft has made it back in since), and then in the
consensus decision to redirect. Options for the redirect are
Terra nullius and
Croatia–Serbia border dispute. I'd suggest the latter, as it's a good article, and it's where the other non-notable micronation, Enclava, now redirects to (having previously been pointed to the Terra nullius article section
[1]). It's where Kekistan and Autia will go, if they go anywhere.
Bromley86 (
talk)
23:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)reply
For what it's worth, I wouldn't like to see more than a cursory mention over there (such as we already have) myself.
This is what the Ongal article looked like before its proponents reverted to a pre-review version (i.e. pretty thin, once you take out the background already in the Croatia-Serbia border dispute article). It had previously been a redirect for nearly a year.
[2]Bromley86 (
talk)
23:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.