The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Obviously fails
BIO, so obvious delete. No sources means no article. Not even a mention, from what I can find.
Acalycine(talk/contribs) 11:54, 6 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. Although it's clearly an over-promotional article, he does appear to have held positions that confer enough notability for an article. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:45, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 12:38, 14 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 23:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete – Sorry, just does not meet guidelines. If he were “Director” a case could be made. But as “Additional” does not meet standards. ShoesssSTalk 14:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.