The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Strong Keep: You misterpret the rule here; it is meant to keep wikipedia from being cluttered with individual entries about words that aren't of general interest. But a single article on the technical jargon of a specific field of study is entirely appropriate and useful, and indeed necessary for many fields.
LDC18:30, 24 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep I think the intent of "not a slang or idiom guide" is that we not become Urban Dictionary. This doesn't push us any closer. (
ESkog)(
Talk)21:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. Strrange nomination as the cited passage clearly states such a page is useful. Obviously the article also allows us to not have dozens of minor articles on concepts that otherwise can be better explained in a context.
200509:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong keep this is an article about poker jargon with lots of examples, not many articles about individual poker terms. —
siroχo11:21, 26 February 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.