The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Woodknight: It may be important and useful, but
notability is a pretty specific thing on Wikipedia that boils down to whether or not a subject has received in depth coverage by
reliable secondary sources. That it is used, implemented, allowed, etc. again may make it important but not notable. Articles in newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and reliable websites (the details of what is considered "reliable" are
here), but not letters, sources produced by the product's creator, sources produced by anyone in a business relationship with the creator (e.g. to use the software in another product),
self-published sources like most blogs, and so on. If none of these exist it may still be
WP:TOOSOON. --— Rhododendritestalk \\ 15:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Doesn't have the coverage needed for
WP:GNG. The sources are not independent, not reliable (blogs), or don't show significant coverage.
Jakejr (
talk) 19:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.