The result was No consensus default to status quo. Jayron 32 02:41, 7 November 2009 (UTC) reply
I can find no evidence that this organisation has received any coverage from independent reliable sources. Per Wikipedia:Verifiability "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.". From a Google search the only independent coverage I can find is from wikis, Wikipedia mirrors and other sources which could not be considered to be reliable. A Google News search turns up a blog and a user editable website. Beyond trivial mentions the general notability guideline states that a topic should have "received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" in order to "satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article". The specific guideline for companies also states "organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.". So far I cannot find even trivial coverage (from independent reliable sources) - the article is dependent on original research and the official website of the company which hasn't been updated in 18 months. Guest9999 ( talk) 02:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC) reply