The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Peter Mercurio (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP (likely WP:AUTOBIO if you check the creator's username) of a person "notable" only as a municipal councillor in a village of 6K. This is not a claim of notability that gets a person over WP:NPOL — municipal councillors are only "entitled" to Wikipedia articles in internationally famous world cities on the order of New York City, Toronto or London — and the amount of reliable source coverage here doesn't even approach the volume necessary to claim a WP:GNG pass instead. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 03:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete - any WP:NPOL claim would be a red herring - nowhere near enough coverage to substantiate a pass against WP:GNG, regardless of profession. St★lwart ¹¹¹ 04:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:38, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:38, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete no evidence of notability-- Mevagiss ( talk) 12:46, 28 November 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.