The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 06:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Correction. Apologies for confusing
WP:NOT with
WP:Notability.
The Cricket Society is marginally notable re its charitable status but individual members per se are not notable unless in their own right. --BlackJack | talk page 08:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Very Weak Keep, Cricket is big in England, and their charity work is wellknown and in the Cricket world Mr. Byrne is well known.
Callelinea 17:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. No, sorry, Mr Byrne is not well known at all. Cricket is certainly big and it is generally known that the Cricket Society is a charitable institution but otherwise you are wide of the target. --BlackJack | talk page 18:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. Random officer of a society, not notable.
Stephen Turner (
Talk) 07:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete - not notable, based on the iinformation given in the article. JH (
talk page) 09:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete no indication that hes done anything beyond his official post. --
Salix alba (
talk) 09:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.