From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK1: nomination withdrawn and no deletion arguments czar 00:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Peculiar Chris

Peculiar Chris (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found nothing that shows this book is notable and the author doesn't have an article. Fails WP:BK. SL93 ( talk) 01:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SL93 ( talk) 01:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. GBooks search indicates that the book seems to have attracted a typical amount of review coverage when it came out, to be recognized as significant by later scholarship, and to be discussed at length in some scholarly sources eg. [1]Roscelese ( talkcontribs) 20:47, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.