The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The previous AfD was closed as redirect because the consensus was the subject was not only notable per
WP:BLP1E. Today, the redirect was reverted, and the user said that we need to "revisit the issue", without adding a single line to the previous version. Hence we go back here.
Ymblanter (
talk)
20:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)reply
It's not that he got coverage for running once for house; it's that he does it repeatedly, and is getting coverage again (especially in national conservative media). Take a look:
On its own, this current run wouldn't pass notability, but I argue that his repeated runs (and repeated national coverage) does pass notability.
Ethanbas(
talk)01:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. The new "coverage" is simply in the context of a comment he made in a Twitter tweet, which is not a notability-conferring event at all — so it does not constitute compelling evidence that he's suddenly escaped
WP:BLP1E.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete even those who win the primary are almost never ntoable, those who loose congressional primaries are even less notable. Running for congress more than once does not change someone into being notable. Multiple non-notable acts do not add to notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
02:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete per BLP1E, GNG, NPOLITICIAN. Keep responses do not make me believe additional information can be found to bring this article up to notability standards.
South Nashua (
talk)
18:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete -- non notable as either "businessman, inventor,[3][4] pro bono consultant, or author[5]". Promotional brochure instead of an article.
K.e.coffman (
talk)
03:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep- I changed my mind on this, this guy gets a ton of media coverage, even now. Google news shows thousands of hits. He should clearly pass the bar of significant coverage for GNG. And he plans on running again:
[1] I think the media wouldn't cover him as much if he were challenging anyone other than Paul Ryan.--
Rusf10 (
talk)
23:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.