The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from Mtiffany71. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. I do not support the idea that all postmasters are somehow inherently notable. Especially ones that only served for a year. If the best we can come up with is "X held position Y for one year" then really the choice to delete is clear.
JBsupreme (
talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 17:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
reply