From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Consensus is that the sources provided by Hiroloveswords and others have shown notability. The article has been improved too. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Paul H. Boucher (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor appointed official. The only significant material is some negative material about minor crimes. Wee he a notable elected official it might be relevant--it is not in this case. DGG ( talk ) 18:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 02:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 02:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 02:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 02:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC) reply

TonyTheTiger, I'm a little puzzled by what you mean by "false" biographical sketch, or why a reference being in the public domain is significant. DGG ( talk ) 20:12, 10 May 2015 (UTC) reply

If so, what is notable is the case, not the person. DGG ( talk ) 17:44, 11 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I did a quick search in newspapers.com and quite a few newspaper articles in the late 1960s to early 1970s. His crimes apparently drew a lot of interest. -- I am One of Many ( talk) 08:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.