The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Over-enthusiastic bio for "India's first transgender pastor". " The refs are Indian newspapers, which are no better than tabloids for materials of this sort. DGG (
talk ) 03:21, 29 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Question - is the basis for deletion really that all Indian newspapers are unreliable? — Rhododendritestalk \\ 18:04, 30 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - per rhododendrites question and that sources seem fine. Adding onto issues with this deletion, DGG are you saying that Indian newspapers are reliable unless they are talking about transgender issues? I'd like to know what you mean by "material of this sort."
Rab V (
talk) 18:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
SpacemanSpiff 03:20, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep seems to pass
WP:GNG, sources are perfectly reliable. Nominator has not given a reason on why Indian newspapers should not be considered reliable.
Pratyush (
talk) 10:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep: Probably passes
WP:GNG.
WP:INDAFD does not give me a reason to believe that Indian newspapers are especially unreliable.
Ceosad (
talk) 22:28, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.