The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Disruptive nomination by a sock farm to further a political agenda — Spaceman Spiff 13:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Pasha Patel (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason : Article is of low importance. Person is not well known or notable. Against wiki policies — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrulyFan ( talk • contribs) 04:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 00:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 00:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep Passes WP:NPOL. A quick google search for the term "Pasha Patel Maharashtra Legislative Council" threw up : ^[1] that refers to Pasha Patel being a member of legislative council. ChunnuBhai ( talk) 10:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep, former member of a subnational legislature easily passes WP:NPOL. See http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-maha-polls-will-this-bjp-muslim-candidate-make-history-2024523 -- Soman ( talk) 08:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.