From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Parirau ataroa (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The genus is a nomen nudum (i.e. it is not formally published) published in a pre-print. As the genus is not formally published (and likely never will be, as it is by a non-palaeontologist with many crank ideas, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive996#User:Falconfly) it fails WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. It has received no other coverage and therefore fails the general notability guideline. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 18:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Pinging participants to the Draft deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Parirau ataroa @ SmokeyJoe: @ Lythronaxargestes: @ Dunkleosteus77: @ Chicdat: @ Lightburst: @ DESiegel: @ Robert McClenon: Hemiauchenia ( talk) 18:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 18:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 18:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.