The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Axact. Clear consensus that a separate article is not merited here, but no clear consensus between redirect or delete. Given this and that many of the deletes do not argue against a redirect am closing as redirect.
Davewild (
talk)
21:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete - not a pure hoax in the Wikipedia sense, but the university itself is a scam. It's a degree mill; not accredited nationally or regionally.
—МандичкаYO 😜
19:30, 18 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Axact covered only by NYT, and "university"/Axact-controlled websites with the latter being completely untrustworthy even as
SPS'es.
Abecedare (
talk) 18:44, 19 May 2015 (UTC) (minor ce to add "only" and "and" for clarity.
Abecedare (
talk)
05:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC))reply
Speedy Delete-PCU is registered with the State of California and gives clear addresses to their locations in California which gives some transparency. They also have an ".edu" domain which is only granted after meeting Educause requirements. PCU and Axact could be one in the same or could be just an affiliation. I don't think redirecting the article is appropriate unless there is concrete evidence that they are one and the same. My apologies to the admin. for my earlier edits as it was not my attempt to be disruptive or to derail the article.
Kohpatmay (
talk)
10:21, 20 May 2015 (UTC) —
Kohpatmay (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Redirect to
Axact -- perhaps it's not notable on its own, but readers searching for it will be well served by being directed to the article on the parent company.
Nomoskedasticity (
talk)
10:37, 20 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep No solid evidence that PCU is affiliated with this IT company. All the schools that are listed on the NY Times article do not have edu domains. PCU is the only one of all 370 schools that holds a edu through educause which you have to prove that you are a legit university in order to receive an edu. Their Business License is currently active in Irvine California. You can type in Paramount California University in the search field -->
https://secure.cityofirvine.org/websearch/
Further, when you search their Domain, it comes up with a physical address. I've searched on Linkedin and there are a lot of alumni's in which some who are in high positions including law enforcement
Keep.Delete. It is a bogus university, and Wikipedia provides a valuable service by making this clear. Which it can effectively do by a redirect to
Axact.
Maproom (
talk)
22:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep and edit significantly. Being a scam (as opposed to a hoax in the WP sense) is not a reason to delete, much less speedy delete. The NYT article and the Daily Tribune article are enough to make this a notable scam, and there is probably more coverage out there. Facts from those articles should be added, and the purely promotional aspects of the current article removed, but that is just normal editing.
DES(talk)22:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment- It may be better off being redirected if there is proof that PCU and Axact are the same. If the decision is being made on these two articles that are less than a week old, then the article should be deleted and maybe re posted at a later date with addendum's.
Kohpatmay (
talk)
01:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment- If the Tribune article is not accessible then it shouldn't be used as source of information. Also, this was an opinion by the Tribune to conclude that PCU is a "Diploma Mill" and not hard facts. If the reporter would have paid and received the degree within a month, then that would be hard facts. This is not the case. It may be better if you either delete the article or remove the "Tribune" information as it's not accessible to the reader. Also, quoting an expert is not enough as well. Who is the expert that quoted this information? It doesn't say. The NY Times article just came out 3 days ago and Axact is being investigated. It would be better to monitor this page until real hard facts conclude that PCU is in fact a "Diploma Mill" and affiliated with Axact. Moreover, as you can see things are starting to unfold. We should not jump to conclusions just because it's the NY Times. They can be wrong as well. Here's the most up to date information on the Axact situation ->
http://tribune.com.pk/story/889849/axact-gate-probe-foreign-experts-might-be-called-in-for-help-says-nisar/Univers1111 (
talk)
09:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Not in any way reliable. The Dept. of Education
removed CUFCE from its "Education Resource Organizations Directory" in 2010 after it was discovered that CUFCE was issuing fake college diplomas for $100. --
Dr. Fleischman (
talk)
05:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.