- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of largest stars. Liz Read! Talk! 07:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
PMMR 62
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PMMR 62 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not exactly sure why I created this article. Anyway, does not meet WP:SIGCOV and therefore not WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to the list of largest stars. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 08:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. The {{ Notability}} tag is in the article since 2021 and the notability problem was never resolved. Fail WP:NASTRO. Also, you were the one who created this article.
- InTheAstronomy32 ( talk) 13:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete because the {{ Notability}} tag has been there since March 2021 and issue not resolved. User:Hamterous1 ( discuss anything!🐹✈️) 00:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of largest stars per other similar AfDs. SevenSpheres ( talk) 16:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of largest stars as {{ R to list entry}}: the star is not notable per WP:GNG/ WP:NASTRO but is mentioned in the appropriate list. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 12:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.