The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
KTC (
talk) 00:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as unless this can be better improved, I'm not seeing much at this time.
SwisterTwistertalk 18:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - yes, nothing here. Doesn't come close to the relevant guidelines.
Frickeg (
talk) 21:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, no independent coverage, fails the GNG. Don't think a redirect is necessary either. IgnorantArmies(talk) 11:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)reply
A leader of a minor fringe party can get into Wikipedia as a topic in their own right if enough
reliable source coverage is present to get them over
WP:GNG — but indeed, it's not a role that gets a person an automatic
WP:NPOL pass, and this is parked on a single source. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 15:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete I agree with IgnorantArmies above, except to say that a redirect would not hurt too much as it is possible a reader may search for him.
AtHomeIn神戸 (
talk) 02:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete: Highest claim is as losing candidate to a state legislature, with 0.01% support. Doesn't seem to have enough independent third-party coverage to meet
WP:GNG, but I didn't dive in too deeply. Maybe redirect to
Arts Party, but that itself seems to be of uncertain notability under
WP:GNG also. --
Closeapple (
talk) 13:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.