The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I don't see how this is any less encyclopaedic than some of the other articles on Wikipedia. Boring as hell, but I think merits inclusion.
Movementarian00:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Keep - of nostalgic and aesthetic interest. But, as Movementarian says, it's not well written. Also, too similar to teamfx2000 page (referenced multiple times).
ScottMainwaring03:29, 30 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Keep Majority rules. I think there are some psychological effects to the older idents for some or for me at least. It may not be really encyclopaediac, but useful and easy to get to for the info.
Steven31201:48, 2 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment Exactly it's information that will be of use to many people and it's obviously overwheling that most people want it to say.
Mike02:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.