The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doesn't meet
WP:GNG. The poor quality references don't establish significant coverage, nor do they confirm much of the text which reads like a self-written game review, so I suspect
WP:OR.
Derek Andrews (
talk)
14:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep: Plenty of reviews on Pako 2 given a flick through the news section in a BEFORE google search, as well as the critic links in metacritic (one needs a google translate). Certainly enough to satisfy
WP:GNG, as well as
WP:NVG for those that like it.
These refs are all for Pako 2, and I'd suggest a name-change, post a keep !vote in AfD. Regarding the
WP:OR claim - I think that might be hard to demonstrate sufficiently. There are
WP:PROMO aspects, and it clearly isn't smoothly written, but neither of those is grounds for deletion.
Nosebagbear (
talk)
20:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keephttps://toucharcade.com/2014/08/22/pako-car-chase-simulator-review/ is a review for the first game written in 2014, but the title is now changed to talk about the second game that came out in 2017. The metacritic entry
http://www.metacritic.com/game/ios/pako-2 is for the second game. Do the four review sites it mentions there count as reliable sources? The article at the time it was nominated for deletion was about both games. I think the name should be changed back, and just have both games there since you have references for both of them, and they are similar.
DreamFocus19:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.