The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Olsen was a non-medaling competitor in the Olympics. We lack any sourced on Olsen that provide any prose. The sportsreference.com source here has no prose. The only other source I found searching google, google books and google news archive with and without the term "runner" was an Olympedia source which also lacks any prose on Olsen. It gets better. There were 57 competitors in the 1928 Olympic marathon that completed. Olsen was not one of those. He was one of the 69 people who started that race but one of 12 who did not finish. So realy about all we know about Olsen was he was in a marathon he did not complete. This is not exactly the thing that notability to the level of having an article is made of.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
16:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Deletion discussions are not "targeting" the creator of an article. They are seeking to remove articles that do not meet inclusion criteria. Of the 12 on people who started but did not finish the 1928 Olympic marathon, 11 were created by Lugnuts. Some of the others have other points to suggest notability, some do not. Each needs to be considered on their own. To claim that nomination is targeting the article creator is misrepresenting the nature of deletion discussions and claiming ownership, while in fact Wikipedia articles do not have owners. I would like someone to actually tell us what number of articles Lugnuts has created, so that what is actually going in is put in perspective. The number is probably at least 100 times the number of articles created by Lugnuts I have nominated for deletion. As explained over and over again there is an attempt to bring our Olympic articles into line with our Olympic inclusion criteria. This is not aimed at any particular editors work. The most recent Olympic article I nominated for deletion was created by a different editor for example.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
18:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep and improve using Danish sources. (see below) I imagine that being the leader of the Danish National Socialist party in 1940 might be sort of notable, as might be being the co-founder of Dansk Nordisk Front in the same year. And that's not considering his role as a collaborator during the occupation of Denmark.
Blue Square Thing (
talk)
17:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
(1) He fails
WP:NSPORTS as it now stands, excluding people who are listed in directories but fail
WP:GNG for lack of sources. (2) The Danish article about the party he founded,
da:Dansk Nordisk Front, is unsourced. For all I can tell, he may have been the only member. Nothing in
da:Orla Olsen suggests that his political career was of any note, and he fails
WP:GNG on this count also.
Narky Blert (
talk)
19:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
comment I agree that, based on the current article, this is a prime candidate for deletion. From what I see, his only significant notoriety might be as Gauleiter of Copenhagen under the Nazis, but the lack of any war crime prosecution tends to argue against it.
Mangoe (
talk)
19:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
We have had this before. Digitised Danish newspapers are available online only up to 1921 - later ones can only be accessed from libraries inside Denmark.
See here.
Ingratis (
talk)
22:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
weak keep status as an athlete and leader of a party that got seats in a national assembly probably means sources exist, they just aren't online.
Hobit (
talk)
12:15, 16 June 2022 (UTC)reply
At least on the athletic front, no there is no indication that sources exist on everyone who was in the Olympics, especially people who did not finish the race they were in. For the other matter, we need people to actually produce actual sources, not just hand wave that sources are hard to find.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
17:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)reply
For what it is worth, the article still says nothing about his role as a Nazi collaborator during WWII. If people want to argue for weak keep based on that, they should at least bother to add some prose about his role there in the article.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
17:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)reply
I'll see what I can do - I've been kinda busy with one thing and another and my Danish and Swedish - he appears in at least one work by Bosse Schön (which has prose btw) - are basic at best. Obviously I don't have access to Danish newspaper resources which would make life an awful lot easier. That's unfortunate, but I'm not based in Denmark - and would probably struggle with the translation anyway. But it seems reasonable that there will be some coverage in those that could be garnered. But anyway, it's been a little more than two days one day since the article was nominated. It is a little disappointing perhaps that you appear not to have checked the Danish article first. That provides some sourcing and also his full name, which might have been more useful to search using. But those inter-wiki links are tucked away down on the left there and aren't something that is easily spotted, so that's understandable of course. I am surprised you didn't find the documentary film that he appears in - it's on the second page of my ghits; that might have provided some ideas of where else to look; from that he appears to have been a Sysselleder (a gauleiter) in 1938.
Blue Square Thing (
talk)
19:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)reply
delete His Olympic participation is really the least of his three "tries" at notability, so I see redirecting on the basis of athletics misleading. I did find a reference in Swedish to his gauleiter position, but it appears to be very passing. I don't see anything that approaches the kind of extended treatment that would constitute the basis for biographical treatment here.
Mangoe (
talk)
02:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:GNG (lack of SIGCOV),
WP:NOLYMPICS (not a medalist), and
WP:NPOL (doesn't appear to have been elected to a qualifying office). Also no clear redirect target given his varied endeavors. Article can be recreated if actual SIGCOV is later discovered.
Cbl62 (
talk)
03:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
I doubt that this is a published book. There is essentially no publication data, and the translation of the note acto Google/Bing translate is "Danish personalia clippings mainly contain clippings from Danish newspapers". I agree that it shows at least one person found him interesting enough to make the compilation, but as a signifier of notability it is at best underwhelming.
Mangoe (
talk)
00:39, 21 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Yeah, but if there are enough clippings for that to exist at all, those clippings are likely enough to meet WP:N.
Hobit (
talk)
14:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)reply
It looks like there may be a way to do the request in English. From there, scans would be all that's needed. Not sure it's a worthwhile use of your time of course...
Hobit (
talk)
21:48, 21 June 2022 (UTC)reply
On reflection, this would be better to be redirected. There are clearly some sources in Danish and Swedish, but the ones that anyone here appears to be able to access are sketchy. And my Danish and Swedish isn't up to bothering to develop the article just to see it deleted anyway. I have absolutely no doubt at all that if we were to be able to access Danish print archives that we could find enough bits and pieces about him to satisfy GNG - and I do mean absolutely no doubt at all. So, to preserve the page history, attribution and access to sources and because it's much more efficient to do so, a redirect to either
Athletics at the 1928 Summer Olympics – Men's marathon or
Denmark at the 1928 Summer Olympics. A link to the Danish article should then be inserted as a placeholder on both articles. As and when sources emerge the redirect can be reverted and the article expanded.
Blue Square Thing (
talk)
22:10, 25 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete and Redirect to
Athletics at the 1928 Summer Olympics – Men's marathon- An unsuccessful Olympic competitor from a time when the Olympics were nowhere near the big deal that they are now. No non-database sources have been presented about his competitive career. This person's political activities seem to make a better claim for notability and, though I am far from convinced, I'd be more willing to be convinced of notability on that basis than the Olympics stuff.
ReykYO!23:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.