The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Improve instead of delete. I'm not sure why you're being
soquick to nominate virtual world articles for deletion instead of opting to improve them. GSK ● ✉✓15:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Note: I've already noticed six of the twelve sources to be from locations other than the product website and forum. Your argument has collapsed on itself. GSK ● ✉✓00:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete as not passing
WP:GNG with multiple independent in-depth secondary sources, such as
WP:VG/RS. The sources in the article are mostly directly primary (including press release).
[1] (uses their engine, so hardly independent) and
[2] are also both interviews (primary). Neither is a
WP:VG/RS.
[3] comes closest to actual third-party coverage and is probably a decent source (even though the reporter is basically quoting and paraphrasing the CEO). I can't any more sources in news, books or vg sources. There aren't enough references or reviews available to reliably source and thus actually improve the content with real world significance or reception (
WP:WAF). —
HELLKNOWZ ▎
TALK12:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.