The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti ^Talk 08:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC) reply

OneFamily

OneFamily (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply a local newly started group for which my searches including at known British news have found nothing better than this and this, still nothing substantially convincing. SwisterTwister talk 04:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC) reply

• Appears to be an established UK mutual, government approved and listed on website (previously known as FamilyInvestments, now redirects). Also cited by BBC . Charitable work is recognised by The Princes Trust and Sport England. TheOneJohnBrown87UK ( talk) 11:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep - seems notable. I've deleted most of the promotional materials and added some more citations. Blythwood ( talk) 11:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.