The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete There's only one source. This source may not be reliable. Fails
WP:FILMMAKER.
Hayleez(talk) 21:16, 29 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep: Nominator clearly didn't do a
WP:BEFORE check. Look at the amount of seemingly reliable sources on the Danish Wikipedia page, and
Olsen's Worldcat entry shows that there are multiple books focused on him.
Curbon7 (
talk) 21:48, 29 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep. It is understandable why a review of online, English-language sources would suggest that the individual does not meet GNG, given that the worked mainly in Denmark and passed almost a century ago, but as noted by Curbon7 there are a huge amount of sources available offline and in Danish, as can be seen in the Danish version of the article.
BilledMammal (
talk) 03:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Clearly notable (though perhaps more as a businessman than as a creative professional), and several high-quality sources exist (in Danish, at least) for expanding the article.
Hqb (
talk) 08:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep for the reasons above. Editors should
WP:Assume Good Faith on offline, and non-English language sources especially when they are numerous and apparently reliable.
BuySomeApples (
talk) 21:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.