From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:08, 23 October 2019 (UTC) reply

O. E. Price (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:JUDGE being at most a state court of appeal judge. Page created by serial copyright violater. Refs 1 and 10 are uncited notes; 2 and 3 paid/not-indep obituaries, 4 is routine, 9 is broken, 5 makes no mention, 9 lists too many people at once, and 7 and 8 are WP:BIO1E involving a criminal conviction against him that was dismissed in the end, so GNG is not really satisfied. ミラ P 16:09, 16 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 16:09, 16 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 16:09, 16 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 16:09, 16 October 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.