The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability not shown Nosebagbear ( talk) 13:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Nupur Sharma (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL. Local politician who failed to get any substantial coverage and not elected representative yet. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 10:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 10:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 10:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 10:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. The only notability claims stated here are that she was an unsuccessful candidate for political office and that she was president of a university student union — but neither of those are "inherently" notable roles that get a person into an encyclopedia in and of themselves, and the article is not referenced nearly well enough to make her markedly more special than everybody else who's done the same things. Bearcat ( talk) 19:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. If article reading Clearly shown Fails WP:NPOL. Local politician who failed to get any substantial coverage and she was an unsuccessful candidate Fail WP:GNG. - Nocturnal306 ^talk 21:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply
• delete The subject fails general notability guidelines, because there is no significant coverage of them. Also, the subject fails notability guidelines for politicians. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. This is plainly a run of the mill, non-notable lawyer. Many a lawyer, including me, has run and lost for public office. Bearian ( talk) 01:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete – Not enough coverage, not finding much in searches, fails NPOL. Eagleash ( talk) 07:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.