The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Autobiography in which notability is not established. The only two sources included are not independent and do not provide any in-depth coverage. It fails
WP:BIO and
WP:GNGCrystallizedcarbon (
talk) 07:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: these are the only third-party sources I could find:
1 and
2. They're both inadequate.
...is just him and another commentator speculating about one video-game, he isn't the primary topic of the video.
...is a compilation of reviews, one of which he features in, again, not the primary topic and no indication that he is well-known as a reliable reviewer.
Aside from the notability problem, we've got a verifiability issue. I've blanked the personal life section because it was completely unreferenced.
Delete: The sources are not independent and don't provide enough coverage to pass the general notability guidelines. As such, the article does not meet
WP:AUTHOR.
RetiredDuke 14:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.